Disclaimer: I'm basing this vaguely on my experiences at Brown University, and I do seriously love graduation stuff, this is all in good fun.
Ceremony Schedule for Graduation 2013
Way Too Damn Early: the graduates line up, roughly 1/3 of them not wearing their caps correctly
Way Too Damn Early: their families get seated and proceed to hate the graduate for making them get up
Way, WAY Too Damn Early: Mother Effing Bagpipes
(the weather will need to be either 90 with blistering sun, or intermittent rain)
9:30 AM: Procession begins
10 AM in 2035: Procession ends
10:30 AM: National Anthem sung quite proficiently by a graduate with the last lines sung terribly by all of the graduate's friends and family
10:45 AM: Why the hell are we still using Latin, the president of the University just conferred the degrees on all the graduates but no one had any idea
10:46 AM: Scattered and late applause because what? The dozen Classics majors are cheering wildly because they understood
10:47 AM: Teenage boy in the family sitting behind you opens up the large pizza they may have had ordered to the main field
11:00 AM: They're walking again, why are they walking AGAIN. Oh my God we're gonna be here forever
11:30 AM: Everyone should be seated, which means the weather will instantly be the worst it's been all day and the graduates realize that their caps and gowns only amplify the effects of the weather, which means 90 degree heat feels like 105 and cold rain feels like ice
11:31 AM: Graduates discover that there are granola bars and water under their seats and this is the happiest they will be all day
11:40 AM: Senior orations, oh my gosh everything is adorable, they are the cutest, their families must be so proud, I am legit gonna tweet everything they say because they are the best ever and oh my gosh oh my gosh stop it I can't even
12 PM: Beginning of honorary degree conferring
12:05 PM: College makes rookie mistake and chooses to let Ben Affleck go first
12:06 PM: Crowd loses its collective mind; grandmothers are shouting "SPEECH, SPEECH"
12:07 PM: Ben Affleck talks for like 20 seconds, crowd continues to lose its mind
12:08 PM: Some other people get honorary degrees but no one really gives a shit, legit these people could have eradicated tuberculosis but the college chose to lead with Ben Affleck and it's unfortunately all downhill from here
12:10 PM (not pictured): Someone from the college starts drafting apology letters to every honorary degree recipient who is not Ben Affleck; has to delete "look, you didn't make Argo, what did you expect?" and start over again
12:30 PM: Bachelor's Degrees conferred
12:35 PM: Joint Bachelor's and Master's Degrees conferred
12:40 PM: Joint Bachelor's and Master's and Ph.D. Degrees conferred
12:45 PM: Joint Bachelor's and Master's and Ph.D Degrees and Certified Yoga Instructor and Class M License and Food Preparation Certificates conferred
12:55 PM: That one dude who thinks he deserves to see more than anyone else stands up at this random point in the ceremony and continues to stay standing till the end
1:00 PM: A grandfather who is too old to care loudly asks if "this damn thing is over yet"
1:15 PM: Faculty is awarded tons of Awesomeness Medals, graduates and alumni suddenly learn that one of the old dudes on the stage has been a professor for like 85 years and won a goddamn Nobel Prize, like a NOBEL PRIZE, he is BRILLIANT and we have a NOBEL LAUREATE on our goddamn FACULTY, how did we not KNOW THIS
1:30 PM: Literally none of the graduates know the words to their school's song but they will all give it the Old College Try
1:32 PM: Crowd is restless like a herd of animals before a thunderstorm
1:35 PM: Ceremony ends, graduates launch their caps in the air causing several serious injuries when they return to the ground
1:36 PM: EVERYONE STANDS UP AT ONCE MOVE MOVE MOVE
1:37 PM: Weather immediately becomes 72 degrees with a few clouds in the beautiful blue sky.
Tuesday, May 28, 2013
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Some youthful things that I don't understand
Presented in no particular order
- Any and all new dance moves starting with the Dougie
- No really like what are they, wasn't like basically all dance invented already including the Harlem Shake which to my knowledge is not the same thing
- The Disney Channel's current programming
- I could not name a single show on that channel right now, and I'm still trying to process the fact that Lizzie McGuire had a baby. Like an actual baby. I remember when her biggest issue was murder-mystery-party-related drama and dealing with her younger brother with that friend he had that never talked
- PINK by Victoria's Secret
- Is this a sex thing
- No really I don't get it
- And the clothes say "LOVE PINK" like what does that mean like "I Love Pink" or "love, Pink" like Pink is now an entity capable of signing letters or like a demanding "LOVE PINK OR WE WILL DO BAD THINGS"
- Tumblr
- Yes I have one
- Adrienne has to post things because I don't totally get it
- Crop tops
- Like this is a shirt but it's not really on what occasions can you wear this
- It's not an issue of it being "too revealing" because oh my God who cares but srsly when can you wear one
- Also it's fascinating because if you asked like a hundred people what body part they most like to show off I wonder how many would say "my lower abdominal area"
- Putting feathers in your hair
- It always kinda looks like you just ate a bird and got a little messy
- No issue if that's what you're going for but I think it's not?
- Zombies
- These are people you knew who died terribly and then get back up and start walking around and want to eat your head
- How is this cool and not the most terrifying thing ever
- Like seriously the fact that there are zombie-comedy movies out there blows my mind because AHHH THEY ARE DEAD AND THEY STILL MOVE
- I am a wimp
- Most slang phrases
- Yolo
- I use this regularly but it does not mean I understand it because I say things like "bought another book for my Kindle #yolo" and I don't think that's right
- I really don't know how you're supposed to use it, do you say it when you're doing something dangerous or something good for you?
- Throwing shade
- What does this mean, I think it's like a bad thing?
- See also "mean mugged"
- I learned "mean mugged" from Kieffer on Teen Mom 2
- Bougie
- Not a damn clue about this one
- Swag
- Just kidding this is a GREAT word and I use it correctly all the time
- Sock buns
- It took me a really long time to get that this wasn't just like a fun name for this but you are supposed to put an actual sock in your hair
- A/S/L
- I thought this was the abbreviation for American Sign Language
- I have no clue what it means and I can't seem to search in an effective way can someone please just tell me
- Bieber
- Haven't the faintest
- It's like a boy band but there's just one boy
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Women and books, women in books
Earlier this week, the results of a challenge posted by author Maureen Johnson hit The Huffington Post, and I had a grand old time looking through the results, which you can find here. Basically, flip the covers of books so that the "girly" no longer look girly, and vice versa.
My personal favorite was Lord of the Flies, but all of these are truly well done, and I hope there's work in the artists' futures. However, this coverflip is just one tiny aspect of areas that are just straight up ridiculous for female authors and books about women and women who read books. You know I'm gonna break this down so get ready.
Women authors
The number of women who have used pseudonyms or their initials is absurdly long, and this is not some issue that's no longer a problem. Rowling did it. Yep, it's easy to forget because no one really cares too much now that she's so successful, but she did that on purpose to hopefully sell more books. It's not like this is some 1800s throwback issue or even a Andre Norton-era issue. This still happens. N.K. Jemisin? Sci-fi/fantasy/speculative fiction author who goes by initials instead of Nora because this still happens. She's also a woman of color, and has problems because of that (like her books being placed in the African-American section), but that needs its own post. Women authors are scared that their own names will frighten away potential readers regardless of content.
Not only is this a problem when women try to publish under their own names like they need to be ashamed of them, but they'll get shredded for "not getting it" if they try to write about men. Men writing about women is just always going to be a little awkward and is apparently forgivable, but women writing about men emasculates the men somehow. George R.R. Martin, bless his heart and his books and may he finish them quickly, is under the impression that women notice their own breasts and the cloth that covers them when they walk. NOPE. Writing for a sex or gender of which you are not a member is always challenging, but it is not okay that the problems associated with it are ignored for male authors while female authors are destroyed for it. Or, reviewers claim they emasculate men if they say anything critical (like Margaret Atwood apparently did to Jimmy in Oryx and Crake).
And then, of course, the covers. Book covers are frequently sexist, racist, and just all around horrible. Let's not even talk about the ones that are "now a major motion picture." I'm still recovering from seeing Ella Enchanted get that treatment.
Books about women
"Books about women" end up in their own category, with "chick-lit" as its own little terrible subset. Men and women read books about men, and women read books about women. Please let me reiterate: books about women are not given their own space because women have struggles inherent to their sex. They are separated because it is assumed that men won't read them.
What sells is brotime and ladytime: bros get fighting and angst, women get "drama" and "feelings." Even if those plots are exactly the same, wars are male and drama is female.
Personally, I've lied by omission when trying to get people to read The Hunger Games; I just conveniently leave out that it's a female author and female narrator and let the person just buy the book and deal with it. (Interestingly, the covers on those three books are decidedly not girly.)
One of my best moments in college (who am I kidding, this was one of my best moments EVER) was when some truly excellent people brought Tamora Pierce to my campus. This was an author who truly helped shape my childhood with her amazingly detailed, kick-ass fantasy novels, and she's been writing since before I was born. She read an excerpt from her then-unpublished next book, signed basically whatever you wanted her to sign, did a big ol' question and answer panel, and was just generally amazing.
Her books' main characters, 95 percent of the time, are female. The audience was 90 percent female. A friend of mine there mentioned she had a male friend who did not attend because he was scared of it being all girls. This is a powerful, fascinating woman with complex, realistic characters in a world that rivals Middle Earth and Westeros in levels of detail, and she gets brushed off because she writes books for teenage girls so she doesn't matter.
I have to lie to people to get them to pick up books with female narrators, while it is just assumed that I'll somehow adapt to a male narrator because I've been doing so for forever. No one's ever said to me "oh you might not like it, it's about guys." Jane Austen is forever "girly books" because they're about women potentially getting married and that's not exciting. And then we have an issue with women who dislike Jane Austen's novels because they don't find them enjoyable describing themselves as like, traitors to womanhood or something. Not liking Ernest Hemingway doesn't make you a traitor to manhood. But she's it, she's all we've got, so everyone feels the need to be nice.
Women who read books
Gonna get a bit more personal here, but this is important and related, too. Women read everything that men read. No, really. If a woman says she's read a book, she probably did! And if she's bragging and didn't read it, she's a liar, but she's not a "fake geek girl." A woman lying about how much of a fan she is is actually the same as a man lying about that. And don't come to me with that "she's just doing it to sound sexy" bullshit like the woman kicked a thousand puppies or something. Lying isn't admirable, but don't act like it's somehow worse that it's a woman pretending. Also, does this even actually happen INQUIRING MINDS NEED TO KNOW
And personal protip to guys who talk to me about books I love: don't try to explain them to me. Don't try to judge how much of a fan I *really* am. And don't act like I'm somehow infringing on your territory. Books are for everyone! If I mention that it took me till book 3 to realize Robb Stark didn't have any POV chapters, don't try to convince me that he does have two, especially when you just began A Clash of Kings. If I am purchasing a fantasy book and reply "yes" to "are you a fantasy reader?" your next move is not to name three authors, listen to my reply that I haven't read their work yet, and then say "well you're not really a fantasy fan then, are you?" When I tell you I read and enjoyed many of Orson Scott Card's books, please don't immediately launch into "umm didn't you know he hates gay people?"
No mansplaining. I'm going to read these books and I'm going to know things about them and some books I haven't read yet and things are problematic and I GET IT. And there are TONS like me. Deal with it and talk to me like I'm just another person who read these books.
Everything I just said obviously does not mean that every book read by, written by, or about women is automatic gold. But please register the fact that I have to even SAY that. Because "this obviously does not mean that every book read by, written by or about men is automatic gold" sounds fucking RIDICULOUS.
So what do we do? Pick up something with or by women, and talk to them about the books you like. Shooting something down because it's about ladies is unacceptable, and so is shooting down ladies talking about your books. Involving women is just involving people, and when we all understand that, the world will explode with books and book discussions.
Or at least I hope.
My personal favorite was Lord of the Flies, but all of these are truly well done, and I hope there's work in the artists' futures. However, this coverflip is just one tiny aspect of areas that are just straight up ridiculous for female authors and books about women and women who read books. You know I'm gonna break this down so get ready.
Women authors
The number of women who have used pseudonyms or their initials is absurdly long, and this is not some issue that's no longer a problem. Rowling did it. Yep, it's easy to forget because no one really cares too much now that she's so successful, but she did that on purpose to hopefully sell more books. It's not like this is some 1800s throwback issue or even a Andre Norton-era issue. This still happens. N.K. Jemisin? Sci-fi/fantasy/speculative fiction author who goes by initials instead of Nora because this still happens. She's also a woman of color, and has problems because of that (like her books being placed in the African-American section), but that needs its own post. Women authors are scared that their own names will frighten away potential readers regardless of content.
Not only is this a problem when women try to publish under their own names like they need to be ashamed of them, but they'll get shredded for "not getting it" if they try to write about men. Men writing about women is just always going to be a little awkward and is apparently forgivable, but women writing about men emasculates the men somehow. George R.R. Martin, bless his heart and his books and may he finish them quickly, is under the impression that women notice their own breasts and the cloth that covers them when they walk. NOPE. Writing for a sex or gender of which you are not a member is always challenging, but it is not okay that the problems associated with it are ignored for male authors while female authors are destroyed for it. Or, reviewers claim they emasculate men if they say anything critical (like Margaret Atwood apparently did to Jimmy in Oryx and Crake).
And then, of course, the covers. Book covers are frequently sexist, racist, and just all around horrible. Let's not even talk about the ones that are "now a major motion picture." I'm still recovering from seeing Ella Enchanted get that treatment.
Books about women
"Books about women" end up in their own category, with "chick-lit" as its own little terrible subset. Men and women read books about men, and women read books about women. Please let me reiterate: books about women are not given their own space because women have struggles inherent to their sex. They are separated because it is assumed that men won't read them.
What sells is brotime and ladytime: bros get fighting and angst, women get "drama" and "feelings." Even if those plots are exactly the same, wars are male and drama is female.
Personally, I've lied by omission when trying to get people to read The Hunger Games; I just conveniently leave out that it's a female author and female narrator and let the person just buy the book and deal with it. (Interestingly, the covers on those three books are decidedly not girly.)
One of my best moments in college (who am I kidding, this was one of my best moments EVER) was when some truly excellent people brought Tamora Pierce to my campus. This was an author who truly helped shape my childhood with her amazingly detailed, kick-ass fantasy novels, and she's been writing since before I was born. She read an excerpt from her then-unpublished next book, signed basically whatever you wanted her to sign, did a big ol' question and answer panel, and was just generally amazing.
Her books' main characters, 95 percent of the time, are female. The audience was 90 percent female. A friend of mine there mentioned she had a male friend who did not attend because he was scared of it being all girls. This is a powerful, fascinating woman with complex, realistic characters in a world that rivals Middle Earth and Westeros in levels of detail, and she gets brushed off because she writes books for teenage girls so she doesn't matter.
I have to lie to people to get them to pick up books with female narrators, while it is just assumed that I'll somehow adapt to a male narrator because I've been doing so for forever. No one's ever said to me "oh you might not like it, it's about guys." Jane Austen is forever "girly books" because they're about women potentially getting married and that's not exciting. And then we have an issue with women who dislike Jane Austen's novels because they don't find them enjoyable describing themselves as like, traitors to womanhood or something. Not liking Ernest Hemingway doesn't make you a traitor to manhood. But she's it, she's all we've got, so everyone feels the need to be nice.
Women who read books
Gonna get a bit more personal here, but this is important and related, too. Women read everything that men read. No, really. If a woman says she's read a book, she probably did! And if she's bragging and didn't read it, she's a liar, but she's not a "fake geek girl." A woman lying about how much of a fan she is is actually the same as a man lying about that. And don't come to me with that "she's just doing it to sound sexy" bullshit like the woman kicked a thousand puppies or something. Lying isn't admirable, but don't act like it's somehow worse that it's a woman pretending. Also, does this even actually happen INQUIRING MINDS NEED TO KNOW
And personal protip to guys who talk to me about books I love: don't try to explain them to me. Don't try to judge how much of a fan I *really* am. And don't act like I'm somehow infringing on your territory. Books are for everyone! If I mention that it took me till book 3 to realize Robb Stark didn't have any POV chapters, don't try to convince me that he does have two, especially when you just began A Clash of Kings. If I am purchasing a fantasy book and reply "yes" to "are you a fantasy reader?" your next move is not to name three authors, listen to my reply that I haven't read their work yet, and then say "well you're not really a fantasy fan then, are you?" When I tell you I read and enjoyed many of Orson Scott Card's books, please don't immediately launch into "umm didn't you know he hates gay people?"
No mansplaining. I'm going to read these books and I'm going to know things about them and some books I haven't read yet and things are problematic and I GET IT. And there are TONS like me. Deal with it and talk to me like I'm just another person who read these books.
Everything I just said obviously does not mean that every book read by, written by, or about women is automatic gold. But please register the fact that I have to even SAY that. Because "this obviously does not mean that every book read by, written by or about men is automatic gold" sounds fucking RIDICULOUS.
So what do we do? Pick up something with or by women, and talk to them about the books you like. Shooting something down because it's about ladies is unacceptable, and so is shooting down ladies talking about your books. Involving women is just involving people, and when we all understand that, the world will explode with books and book discussions.
Or at least I hope.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)